오픈 소스 소프트웨어 평가 방법론
EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki
package.lua 80번째 줄에서 Lua 오류: module 'Module:Namespace detect/data' not found. package.lua 80번째 줄에서 Lua 오류: module 'Module:Message box/localize' not found.
자유/오픈 소스에 대한 평가를 하기 위한 몇가지 방법론을 의미한다. 오픈 소스의 퀄리티, 구조, 사용량 등의 관점에서 평가를 하며, 기능적인 측면에서 평가하기도 한다.
방법론[편집]
20가지가 넘는 방법론이 존재한다.
- Open Source Maturity Model (OSMM) from Capgemini
- Open Source Maturity Model (OSMM) from Navica
- Open Source Maturity Model (OSSMM) by Woods and Guliani[2]
- Methodology of Qualification and Selection of Open Source software (QSOS)
- Open Business Readiness Rating (OpenBRR)
- Open Business Quality Rating (OpenBQR)[3]
- QualiPSo OpenSource Maturity Model (OMM)
- QualiPSo Model for Open Source Software Trustworthiness (MOSST)[4]
- QualOSS – Quality of Open Source
- Evaluation Framework for Open Source Software[5]
- A Quality Model for OSS Selection[6]
- Atos Origin Method for Qualification and Selection of Open Source Software (QSOS)[7]
- Observatory for Innovation and Technological transfer on Open Source software (OITOS)[8]
- Framework for OS Critical Systems Evaluation (FOCSE)[9]
비교[편집]
비교 기준[편집]
Stol와 Babar는 OSS 방법론에 대해 비교분석을 제안했다. 다음 프레임워크 리스트는 다음 기준을 따라 비교되었다: 해당 기준은 사용성, 사용자들의 방법, 평가에 따라 분류되었다.
비교표는 다음 기준을 따른다.
- Seniority : 방법론이 개발 된 년도
- Original authors/sponsors : 원 저자
- License : 사용 및 평가 결과에 대한 저작권
- Assessment model :
- Detail levels : 내용이나 수준에 대한 평가
- Predefined criteria : 미리 정의 된 기준에 따라 평가되는가
- Technical/functional criteria : the methodology permits the use of domain specific criteria based on technical information or features
- Scoring model :
- Scoring scale by criterion
- Iterative process : the assessment can be performed and refined using several steps improving the level of details
- Criteria weighting : it is possible to apply weighting on the assessed criteria as part of the methodology scoring model
- Comparison : the comparison process is defined by the methodology
Comparison chart[편집]
| Criteria | OSMM Capgemini | OSMM Navica | QSOS | OpenBRR | OMM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seniority | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2005 | 2008 |
| Original authors/sponsors | Capgemini | Navicasoft | Atos Origin | Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley, SpikeSource, O'Reilly, Intel | QualiPSo project, EU commission |
| License | Non-free license, but authorised distribution | Assessment models licensed under the Academic Free License | Methodology and assessments results licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Assessments results licensed under a Creative Commons license | Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License |
| Assessment model | Practical | Practical | Practical | Scientific | Scientific |
| Detail levels | 2 axes on 2 levels | 3 levels | 3 levels or more (functional grids) | 2 levels | 3 levels |
| Predefined criteria | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Technical/functional criteria | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Scoring model | Flexible | Flexible | Strict | Flexible | Flexible |
| Scoring scale by criterion | 1 to 5 | 1 to 10 | 0 to 2 | 1 to 5 | 1 to 4 |
| Iterative process | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Criteria weighting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Comparison | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
각주[편집]
- ↑ Klaas-Jan Stol, Muhammad Ali Babar. "A Comparison Framework for Open Source Software Evaluation Methods" published in OSS 2010 proceedings. IFIP AICT vol. 319, pp. 389-394.
- ↑ Woods, D., Guliani, G.: Open Source for the Enterprise: Managing Risks Reaping Rewards. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2005)
- ↑ Davide Taibi, Luigi Lavazza, Sandro Morasca. "OpenBQR: a framework for the assessment of OSS" published in OSS 2007 proceedings.
- ↑ http://www.qualipso.org/mosst-champion
- ↑ Koponen, T., Hotti, V.: Evaluation framework for open source software. In: Proc. Software Engineering and Practice (SERP), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, June 21-24 (2004)
- ↑ Sung, W.J., Kim, J.H., Rhew, S.Y.: A Quality Model for Open Source Software Selec- tion. In: Proc. Sixth International Conference on Advanced Language Processing and Web Information Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China, pp. 515–519 (2007)
- ↑ Atos Origin: Method for Qualification and Selection of Open Source software (QSOS) version 1.6, Technical Report (2006)
- ↑ Cabano, M., Monti, C., Piancastelli, G.: Context-Dependent * Evaluation Methodology for Open Source Software. In: Proc. Third IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS 2007), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 301–306 (2007)
- ↑ Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., Frati, F.: FOCSE: An OWA-based Evaluation Framework for OS Adoption in Critical Environments. In: Proc. Third IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference on Open Source Systems, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 3–16 (2007)
외부 링크[편집]
- OSMM from Capgemini[깨진 링크]
- OSMM from Navica
- QSOS
- OpenBRR
- Master thesis on open source selection (In danish)
- Enterprise Maturity Assessment Model (freeware)
- Enterprise Architecture Maturity Assesment Model Software – freeware
- Official QualiPSo OMM webpages
This article "오픈 소스 소프트웨어 평가 방법론" is from Wikipedia. The list of its authors can be seen in its historical. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one.
